Variant subtag request: iso91995

Philip Newton philip.newton at
Sat Sep 18 20:38:09 CEST 2010

On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Doug Ewell <doug at> wrote:
> Are we all decided that it is absolutely, positively wrong to consider
> introducing an extension mechanism for all sorts of transliteration,
> romanization, etc. schemes?  I've suggested this at various times in the
> past and nobody was interested in this or any other extension, but now that
> Mark's extension for CLDR attributes is about to be published and Addison
> has said on-list that "perhaps it would be better" to have such an
> extension, it might gain more traction.

Um, I'm not against such an extension mechanism, but I'm not sure how
much weight my opinion carries (or to whom all you're directing your

Philip Newton <philip.newton at>

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list