Variant subtags for non-ISO-15924 scripts (was Re: Variant subtag request: iso91995)
philip.newton at gmail.com
Thu Sep 16 07:39:54 CEST 2010
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:
> Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote:
>>>> Doug might propose a Ewellic script tag here, mightn't he?
>>> In fact no. The assumption is that ISO 15924/RA can act in all such
>> The ISO 15924/RA might reject Ewellic.
> I would expect the RA to do so, and then I would have a few options:
> (a) request a variant subtag on this list (so "en-ewellic")
> (b) create a private-use subtag ("en-x-ewellic")
> (c) use a script subtag from the ISO 15924 private-use area ("en-Qabe")
> Whenever I tag Ewellic-script text, which isn't all that often, I go with
> option (c). See also http://www.ewellic.org/conscript-15924.html .
Are (a) and (b) really options? I thought those were only for
varieties of a language.
...althought, if they can be used for transliteration schemes, I
suppose they could also be used for new scripts. I never thought about
it, I suppose.
So the take-away is: variant subtags and private-use subtags can also
Philip Newton <philip.newton at gmail.com>
More information about the Ietf-languages