Outstanding requests

Mark Davis ☕ mark at macchiato.com
Thu Oct 28 17:36:02 CEST 2010

As for #2, I want to do a revision, but haven't had the time yet. Hope to in
the coming weeks.

As for #1, I don't see a good reason not to do it. (As I mentioned, CLDR has
a more extensive structure for that kind of data, but for people not using
CLDR, for any languages with an extensive written corpus it is better to
have SS than not).


*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:56, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:

> 1.  What is the current status of Peter's preliminary proposal to add
> Suppress-Script to 48 existing records?  Is it being rejected on
> principle, or should registration forms and revised records be put
> together and posted?
> 2.  What is the current status of Mark's proposal to register variants
> 'respell' and 'vowels' (possibly with different subtag values)?
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
> RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s ­
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20101028/116da8cf/attachment.html>

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list