suppress-script values for fil, mi, pes, prs, qu members

Peter Constable petercon at
Thu Oct 21 20:25:07 CEST 2010

From: ietf-languages-bounces at [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at] On Behalf Of Michael Everson

> So you want us to prcess 50 change requests here to plug a 
> leak based on the way you have "really" implemented. 

It's not a leak in our implementation. If there's a leak, it's in the registry. What we have implemented in the case of quz is exactly what RFC 5646 and you have recommended. But in other processing this creates issues because the registry has a gap in its data.


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list