suppress-script values for fil, mi, pes, prs, qu members
petercon at microsoft.com
Thu Oct 21 20:25:07 CEST 2010
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
> So you want us to prcess 50 change requests here to plug a
> leak based on the way you have "really" implemented.
It's not a leak in our implementation. If there's a leak, it's in the registry. What we have implemented in the case of quz is exactly what RFC 5646 and you have recommended. But in other processing this creates issues because the registry has a gap in its data.
More information about the Ietf-languages