Ietf-languages Digest, Vol 91, Issue 24

Kent Karlsson kent.karlsson14 at telia.com
Thu Jul 22 22:16:11 CEST 2010


Den 2010-07-22 18.13, skrev "Peter Constable" <petercon at microsoft.com>:

> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Anthony Aristar
> 
>> For your information, LINGUIST sends in code-change requests to the
>> 639-3 authority about
>> once a year.  (We never concern ourselves with 639-1/2, since they
>> are far too impoverished for linguistic work) We have quite a bunch
>> we are intending to send this year, and Vedic will probably be one of
>> them.
> 
> In view of this, we might want to hold off on a variant subtag for Vedic.

And it is also not clear, to me at least, what the other requests w.r.t.
sanskrit are variants/dialects of:
>> vaidika    Vedic     ------->    may get its own code in ISO 639-3 registry
>> laukika    Classical ------->    this appears to be "san/sa" in ISO 639
>> bauddha    Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit ----> variant of (Classical) sanskrit
(san) or of Vedic sanskrit or of something else?
>> itihasa    Epic                     ----> variant of (Classical) sanskrit
(san) or of Vedic sanskrit or of something else?

        /Kent k
 
 
> Peter




More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list