Ietf-languages Digest, Vol 91, Issue 24
Kent Karlsson
kent.karlsson14 at telia.com
Thu Jul 22 22:16:11 CEST 2010
Den 2010-07-22 18.13, skrev "Peter Constable" <petercon at microsoft.com>:
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Anthony Aristar
>
>> For your information, LINGUIST sends in code-change requests to the
>> 639-3 authority about
>> once a year. (We never concern ourselves with 639-1/2, since they
>> are far too impoverished for linguistic work) We have quite a bunch
>> we are intending to send this year, and Vedic will probably be one of
>> them.
>
> In view of this, we might want to hold off on a variant subtag for Vedic.
And it is also not clear, to me at least, what the other requests w.r.t.
sanskrit are variants/dialects of:
>> vaidika Vedic -------> may get its own code in ISO 639-3 registry
>> laukika Classical -------> this appears to be "san/sa" in ISO 639
>> bauddha Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit ----> variant of (Classical) sanskrit
(san) or of Vedic sanskrit or of something else?
>> itihasa Epic ----> variant of (Classical) sanskrit
(san) or of Vedic sanskrit or of something else?
/Kent k
> Peter
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list