Language Variant subtags for Sanskrit
Peter Constable
petercon at microsoft.com
Thu Jul 15 03:37:20 CEST 2010
See also this post:
http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/2010-July/010404.html
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Peter Constable
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 9:30 PM
To: Michael Everson; ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
Subject: RE: Language Variant subtags for Sanskrit
I explained why several days ago: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/2010-July/010405.html
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 2:36 PM
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
Subject: Re: Language Variant subtags for Sanskrit
On 14 Jul 2010, at 17:44, Peter Constable wrote:
> IMO, "classical" absolutely should NOT be coded as a variant subtag.
Why not?
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list