Language Variant subtags for Sanskrit

Peter Constable petercon at microsoft.com
Thu Jul 15 03:30:09 CEST 2010


I explained why several days ago: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/2010-July/010405.html


Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 2:36 PM
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
Subject: Re: Language Variant subtags for Sanskrit

On 14 Jul 2010, at 17:44, Peter Constable wrote:

> IMO, "classical" absolutely should NOT be coded as a variant subtag.

Why not?

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages



More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list