ISO 639-3 changes, part 6

Doug Ewell doug at
Sat Feb 20 20:05:33 CET 2010

I wrote:

> Not only do I expect it to be updated, I was assure in private 
> communication that it would be.  When, I don't know.

To clarify:

(1) I do know English, but don't always know how to type; "assure" 
should of course be "assured."

(2) It is not a problem for me that the summary document has not yet 
been updated to include 'aqz' and 'gac' and any other ISO 639-3 changes 
that still need to be made.  The references to the summary document in 
the registration forms are obviously boilerplate, and I simply missed 
the fact that they don't (yet) apply to 'aqz' and 'gac'.

Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ ­

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list