doug at ewellic.org
Fri Sep 11 06:15:03 CEST 2009
Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote:
>> ...the Reviewer ... is expected to be an expert as well as a referee,
>> much more than (say) a WG chair. His or her opinion on technical
>> merits does count more than yours or mine.
> I certainly don't see that stated anywhere. Rather, 3.2 of RFC 5646
You're right, it's not stated. I guess I thought it was conventional
> Note: the Reviewer needs to be informed enough to make use of the
> contribution of experts, not to make unilateral choices.
I certainly never said the Reviewer should act unilaterally.
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s
More information about the Ietf-languages