Variant request: Japanese modified Hepburn
cewcathar at hotmail.com
Tue Sep 1 20:59:29 CEST 2009
I generally favor this proposal also.
Doug Ewell doug at ewellic.org
Tue Sep 1 14:48:43 CEST 2009
>I don't get the sense that it would serve Frank's needs to register
> separate subtags for traditional vs. revised vs. modified Hepburn. If
> someone has a concrete need for that, I suggest we consider second-level
> variants to capture that level of detail, so that "ja-Latn-hepburn"
> would still be available.
One note: it seems that Frank Bennett has requested a subtag for revised Hepburn only? Is that correct? (I don't see any problem with this; but the name hepburn will thus not be available if someone later wishes to distinguish one of the other 'flavors,' for whatever reason.)--C. E. Whiteheadcewcathar at hotmail.com
> . . .
> Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages