Language subtag modification form for 1694acad (Was: Flavors of Hepburn)
addison at amazon.com
Fri Oct 2 22:34:05 CEST 2009
I agree with Mark and Michael and especially Doug. The description of 1694acad is sufficiently precise for it to be used. Users can refer to additional materials as needed (such as the registration form's references) if they are still unsure of whether the subtag is appropriate for their application.
Globalization Architect -- Lab126
Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-
> bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:28 PM
> To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
> Subject: Re: Language subtag modification form for 1694acad (Was:
> Flavors of Hepburn)
> On 2 Oct 2009, at 21:17, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
> > None of the descriptions are that precise, nor is there
> > advantage in trying to add precise descriptions. BCP 47, for
> > example, doesn't describe the precise differences between en-US
> > en-GB, or between pt-BR and pt-PT.
> I agree with Mark.
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
More information about the Ietf-languages