Last call for ISO 15924-based updates

[Mark Davis]

I can live with that, or with no comment.

// The reason that no comment is fine by me is that it is extremely unlikely
that someone mistakenly use, say, ja-Zinh; it is even less likely than their
mistakenly using ja-Ethi or any one of a variety of other scripts.

Mark


On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:27, John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> wrote:

> Doug Ewell scripsit:
>
> > If you really want to see a comment added at this point, we need a
> > consensus quickly, or else a proposal to extend the review period.
>
> Here's my terse proposal:
>
> Comment: Used to tag diacritics only; not for use with documents.
>
> Is there anyone who can't live with this?
>
> --
> John Cowan              cowan at ccil.org          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan<http://www.ccil.org/%7Ecowan>
> Most people are much more ignorant about language than they are about
> [other subjects], but they reckon that because they can talk and read and
> write, their opinions about talking and reading and writing are as well
> informed as anybody's.  And since I have DNA, I'm entitled to carry on at
> length about genetics without bothering to learn anything about it.  Not.
>                        --Mark Liberman
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20090312/2cd4a839/attachment.htm