Last call for ISO 15924-based updates
mark at macchiato.com
Thu Mar 12 18:38:20 CET 2009
I can live with that, or with no comment.
// The reason that no comment is fine by me is that it is extremely unlikely
that someone mistakenly use, say, ja-Zinh; it is even less likely than their
mistakenly using ja-Ethi or any one of a variety of other scripts.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:27, John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> wrote:
> Doug Ewell scripsit:
> > If you really want to see a comment added at this point, we need a
> > consensus quickly, or else a proposal to extend the review period.
> Here's my terse proposal:
> Comment: Used to tag diacritics only; not for use with documents.
> Is there anyone who can't live with this?
> John Cowan cowan at ccil.org http://www.ccil.org/~cowan<http://www.ccil.org/%7Ecowan>
> Most people are much more ignorant about language than they are about
> [other subjects], but they reckon that because they can talk and read and
> write, their opinions about talking and reading and writing are as well
> informed as anybody's. And since I have DNA, I'm entitled to carry on at
> length about genetics without bothering to learn anything about it. Not.
> --Mark Liberman
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages