Adding variant subtags 'aluku' and 'nduyka' and 'pamaka'fordialects
everson at evertype.com
Sun Aug 23 20:01:15 CEST 2009
On 23 Aug 2009, at 18:55, Phillips, Addison wrote:
>> I would like to avoid having to process change forms for these
>> three subtags again later. Isn't that reasonable?
> No. Our process is very simple and the current process allows for
> errata correction of this nature without much rancor or fanfare.
So when I change a name in ISO 15924 the new process will allow that
to happen without endless discussion and debate? ;-)
>> Wouldn't it be possible for (say) you and Doug and Peter to work
>> with him over the next nine days to make a submission to the ISO
>> 639 JAC?
> On what grounds would you be rejecting his request for three
> variants? Or a request for a Description field? Do you have any
> reason to believe that these changes would be factually incorrect?
Did I mention the word "reject"?
My question stands.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
More information about the Ietf-languages