Belarusian 1959acad - LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM (proposed)

[Michael Everson]

On 23 Sep 2008, at 19:52, Ihar Mahaniok wrote:

> I don't want to object here, I am actually ok with 1959acad

Splendid!

> , just some clarification: I don't think "1959" is iconic. Actually,  
> vast majority of users of academic orthography wouldn't recall this  
> date; the word "academic" is more important. Unfortunately, Yury  
> made it clear that he is against all forms of "akadem", "akad",  
> "acad" and so on.

And he thinks 1959 is iconic. And he's the ultimate source of the  
request.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20080924/9b244fbb/attachment.htm