Pending business

Michael Everson everson at
Mon Sep 15 16:59:26 CEST 2008

On 15 Sep 2008, at 15:51, Ihar Mahaniok wrote:

> sorry, one more clarification: both of those are just /spellings/, and
> both of them can be written either Cyrillics or Latin; so both of
> those are script-agnostic by default; just, by matter of fact, they
> are overwhelmingly written in Cyrillic.
> be-Cyrl-akadem, be-Cyrl-tarask, be-Latn-akadem, be-Latn-tarask are all
> possible, though not necessary today, I believe.

Belief is insufficient here. If you believe that all four of those are  
possible, please show us examples of a sentence in each.

Michael Everson *

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list