Yury Tarasievich yury.tarasievich at
Wed Sep 3 19:53:51 CEST 2008

CE Whitehead wrote:

> Persons who write/read this particularity variety of Belarussian will just have to think of a name for the subtag for any new standard--if one arises (of course, if there are going to be many standards . . . that could result in a lot of subtags . . . but this subtag could be later deprecated if it seems neater to have a single subtag identifying this variant and then secondary variant subtags identifying the particular standard/year)
> If persons who read/write Belarussian decide that they prefer [akadem] or [akademy] or [academy] then that is fine with me too.

The 1959acad and 2010acad, when (if) it is actually introduced, are 
quite fine, for me. Any transliterations, unusual truncations, or 
cryptics are wrong thing.


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list