ID for language-invariant strings

Doug Ewell doug at
Tue Mar 18 16:03:16 CET 2008

Mark Davis <mark dot davis at icu dash project dot org> wrote:

>> It seems to me that changing from "no linguistic content" to "not 
>> applicable" isn't a huge degree of broadening, and broadening is not 
>> prohibited. So, if you wanted to push for broadening, that might be 
>> possible. But I think there should be some consensus here before 
>> taking it to the JAC.
> I think that would be a reasonable change.


Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14  ˆ

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list