ID for language-invariant strings
doug at ewellic.org
Tue Mar 18 16:03:16 CET 2008
Mark Davis <mark dot davis at icu dash project dot org> wrote:
>> It seems to me that changing from "no linguistic content" to "not
>> applicable" isn't a huge degree of broadening, and broadening is not
>> prohibited. So, if you wanted to push for broadening, that might be
>> possible. But I think there should be some consensus here before
>> taking it to the JAC.
> I think that would be a reasonable change.
Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
More information about the Ietf-languages