Addition request: alsatian

[CE Whitehead]

Hi,
This seems fine with me; what will happen though to content tagged with gsw-FR if gsw becomes a prefix for a new tag (Randy asked previously, will gsw-FR be synonymous with gsw-Elsässisch ?  probably should be for now)
 
But no doubt some speakers may already be using gsw-FR so the comments field will give this use legitimacy, so I would o.k. it.
 
 
 
 
--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
 
 
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:44:00 +0100> From: bortzmeyer at nic.fr> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:29:53AM +0100,> Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote > a message of 96 lines which said:> > > Type: variant> > Subtag: alsatian> > Description: Alsatian variant of Alemannic> > Description: Els&#xE4;ssisch> > Prefix: gsw> > I withdraw this request for a while. Discussion have shown that there> is not yet "rough consensus" on it (yes, I know that section 3.5 of> RFC 4646 does not make consensus on ietf-languages a mandatory> condition).
> > Also, the discussion on Erzgebirgisch have shown that germanic> languages are a difficult issue.> > I will post soon another request, to add a Comments field to gsw> saying that gsw-FR is suitable for alsatian.> > _______________________________________________> Ietf-languages mailing list> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20080129/3aeecbb3/attachment-0001.html