dewell at roadrunner.com
Tue Jan 29 04:43:19 CET 2008
Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy dot claranet dot de> wrote:
> Sure - I consider to ask in the Last Call to *REJECT* 4646bis,
> because the ISO 639-3 source is not yet good enough to run on
> auto pilot wrt this list, and the proposed "disputed territory"
> region codes are IMO harmful for IANA.
While my distaste for the new region subtags, and concern over the
instability of 639-3, is well known, I think rejecting the draft would
truly be a case of throwing out the good with the bad.
> Nope, only as second sanity check, this list could catch "eur",
> but that is pointless if 4646bis *requires* its registration.
I don't believe this group can justify cherry-picking the European
languages while being unable to judge, say, whether Khasi and Lyngngam
should have been split (see
Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
More information about the Ietf-languages