LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION FORM
Karen_Broome at spe.sony.com
Karen_Broome at spe.sony.com
Thu Jan 10 00:06:53 CET 2008
I do not think the requests conflict. My request is to indicate that "gsw"
is the code for a variety of similar dialects that have several regional
names. The other request is for a particular tag to indicate only one of
these regional dialects -- its prefix is gsw. I do not oppose the
Alsatian variant request, but do wonder if there's a preference for ISO
3166 tags where they can reasonably apply.
Karen Broome
Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com>
Sent by: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
01/09/2008 03:02 PM
To
IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages at iana.org>
cc
Subject
Re: LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION FORM
At 14:43 -0800 2008-01-09, Karen_Broome at spe.sony.com wrote:
>Michael: Please consider my "gsw" Modification Request to be active
>as per Addison's comments.
And the implications of having two concurrent requests in? We are
arguably a supplement to 639 are we not?
--
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20080109/6b368f9e/attachment.html
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list