<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I do not think the requests conflict.
My request is to indicate that "gsw" is the code for a variety
of similar dialects that have several regional names. The other request
is for a particular tag to indicate only one of these regional dialects
-- its prefix is gsw. I do not oppose the Alsatian variant request,
but do wonder if there's a preference for ISO 3166 tags where they can
reasonably apply.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Karen Broome</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com></b>
</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">01/09/2008 03:02 PM</font>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION FORM</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>At 14:43 -0800 2008-01-09, Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com
wrote:<br>
<br>
>Michael: Please consider my "gsw" Modification Request to
be active <br>
>as per Addison's comments.<br>
<br>
And the implications of having two concurrent requests in? We are <br>
arguably a supplement to 639 are we not?<br>
-- <br>
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ietf-languages mailing list<br>
Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no<br>
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages<br>
<br>
</font></tt>
<br>