Progressing beyond borders?making subtags inclusive
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Jan 7 08:40:17 CET 2008
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:45:25PM +0000,
Nicholas Shanks <contact at nickshanks.com> wrote
a message of 150 lines which said:
> I feel that all dialects should have their own subtags, not just the
> ones that partizan individuals propose.
This is a bad start for the discussion. If you call each proposal
"partizan", we will soon go to flame wars...
> As a great example, there's a subtag for en-scouse but not one for
> yorkshire, geordie or brummie, because the guy that submitted the
> scouse request has a vested interest in his own dialect,
That's an extremely biased vision. The IETF have always worked on a
volunteer basis, which has the great feature that people championing a
protocol or a language know about it, they are not "forced" to promote
an unknown thing.
If I requested the registration of "alsatian" and not a general
registration of all alemannic dialects, it's because I know about this
dialect (or knows where to find information).
> nobody has bothered to register the others.
The IETF is volunteer work.
> I believe that having a subtag registered is at present too
I would partly agree (I wrote some of the texts on
http://www.langtag.net/ because I wanted to help registration
beginners) but only partly because registration of a subtag is a
serious matter (once a subtag, always a subtag, there is no way back)
and should not be done lightly.
> (requirement for dictionaries!?
As mentioned already, there is no such requirment.
> I'm sure we can all agree on commonly recognised dialects for
> English, as it is a first langauge for many people on this list, and
> familiar for many others.
I am not sure you properly assert the amount of work it
means. Dialects are more complicated than languages since they are
never formally specified, they have fuzzy borders, etc.
I do not think there is an ISO-639-something on dialects and that's
for a good reason.
> For other languages compiling a list might involve asking a scholar
> for suggestions.
This would be a huge change from "Anyone can request a registration,
if he backs his request with serious facts" from "A committee playing
ISO-639, but without the resources of SIL". I'm note sure I would
approve it. But, anyway, this discussion belongs to the LTRU Working
More information about the Ietf-languages