acade - LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM
mark at macchiato.com
Fri Aug 29 18:03:43 CEST 2008
I think the year is a bad idea, because from all I've heard the year is not
a defining feature, and there are other years attached to other variants.
Moreover, it will be just peculiar to have
for the 2008 version of "akademic Belarusian", as may be desired in the
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Yury Tarasievich <
yury.tarasievich at gmail.com> wrote:
> Frank Ellermann wrote:
> > Mark Davis wrote:
> >> In order to specify the academy version and only the
> >> academy version (not including tarask), we have to
> >> have a tag.
> > Okay, it is up to you now, there were more than enough
> > suggestions for plausible (and not too general) names,
> > and Yuri provided a list of additional references as
> > requested by Michael to arrive at a clear definition.
> > IIRC you don't care about the variant name, just pick,
> > apparently Yuri's evidence and Michael's request could
> > justify "acad1959".
> I'm leaning towards the "1959acad", especially per yesterday's
> guidelines recapitulation by Doug Ewell.
> All other variants (transliterated, unusually truncated, cryptic) I
> consider impractical.
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages