4646bis era (was: wadegile and pinyin LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORMs)
cowan at ccil.org
Tue Aug 26 05:28:51 CEST 2008
Frank Ellermann scripsit:
> I think six months from Last Call to number is more realistic,
> that's what it took for "Archived-At" (RFC 5064) back in 2007.
For this purpose we don't need the RFC to be published. ietf-languages
entered the 4646 epoch as soon as the RFC was accepted and the
new registry set up.
Having a number means we redefine what BCP 47 is, so that people who
reference it will be capturing the new definitions.
John Cowan cowan at ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan
Any sufficiently-complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad-hoc,
informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of half of Common Lisp.
--Greenspun's Tenth Rule of Programming (rules 1-9 are unknown)
More information about the Ietf-languages