wadegile and pinyin LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORMs
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Tue Aug 26 02:18:03 CEST 2008
Broome, Karen wrote:
> I thought the use of the generic "zh" tag instead of
> "cmn" to indicate variants that only apply to Mandarin
> was a substantive objection.
My copy of the registry has no "cmn" - IMO that can't be
a "substantive objection". It was a proposal to withdraw
the request until better times, as seen for "erzgeb".
Apparently Mark doesn't want to wait for better times...
> I also think that you deserve some sort of resolution
> of this issue.
...agreed, and I completely forgot how good RFC 4646 is
for such procedural details. May it prosper.
More information about the Ietf-languages