LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: pinyin
Kent Karlsson
kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se
Tue Aug 5 01:47:23 CEST 2008
Hmm, no; I think one might want to deprecate a prefix *as a prefix*, while not deprecate the prefix as such.
Type: variant
Subtag: fubar
Description: Fubar
Prefix: zh [DEPRECATED]
Prefix: cmn
while not deprecating the language subtag zh as such.
/kent k
_____
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Mark Davis
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 1:27 AM
To: Broome, Karen
Cc: Frank Ellermann; ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: pinyin
Here would be a (made up) example.
In 2005, the following gets added
%%
Type: variant
Subtag: fubar
Description: Fubar
Added: 2006-09-18
Prefix: sr-CS
Comments: Fubar dialect of Serbian used only in CS
Now, later on in 2005, CS gets deprecated as below.
%%
Type: region
Subtag: CS
Description: Serbia and Montenegro
Added: 2005-10-16
Deprecated: 2006-10-05
Comments: see RS for Serbia or ME for Montenegro
At this point, it is unnecessary to have structure to mark sr-CS as being a deprecated prefix of fubar, since a record that that prefix points (CS) to has been deprecated. What would be necessary, however, is to add either "sr-RS" or "sr-ME", or even "sr" as prefixes of fubar so that it would have some valid prefixes.
Mark
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Broome, Karen <Karen_Broome at spe.sony.com> wrote:
If you deprecate X in the example below and not Y, can you give me an example of the IANA Registry Record for this scenario?
Karen
From: mark.edward.davis at gmail.com [mailto:mark.edward.davis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mark Davis
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 4:07 PM
To: Broome, Karen
Cc: Frank Ellermann; ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: pinyin
There is no structure in 4646 or 4646bis for deprecating a prefix X for a subtag Y. However, the same effect would be achieved by just deprecating X, so I don't think we need such structure.
Mark
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Broome, Karen <Karen_Broome at spe.sony.com> wrote:
Hmm. But deprecation occurs on the entire record. Is there a way to indicate that a single prefix is deprecated but not the tag? If we can add prefixes later, we ought to be able to deprecate them too. But I'm not sure how we'd do this in the current structure.
Karen
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Mark Davis
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 3:53 PM
To: Frank Ellermann
Cc: ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: pinyin
No. According to the RFC, we can add other prefixes later.
Mark
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote:
Randy Presuhn wrote:
> "why didn't they use '-pinyin'?"
Just a theoretical thought, if we take -pinyin with prefix
zh-Latn- now there's no way to get rid of the prefix later.
So if folks later want "pinyin" with prefix cmn-Latn- and
others, but without zh-Latn-, they'd be forced to invent
a new variant, say -pinyin2, and that would allow them to
deprecate -pinyin in favour of -pinyin2.
If that is exactly what you want (later, when cmn exists),
you could use -pinyin1 now, and deprecate it in favour of
the later "real" -pinyin with the "real" prefix cmn-Latn-
instead of the slightly "unreal" zh-Latn-pinyin1 possible
today.
Frank
_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20080805/59b588b4/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list