stq vs. frs
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Tue Apr 29 22:50:33 CEST 2008
Debbie Garside wrote:
> Please remember that Ethnologue is not ISO 639-3
ACK, at least 639-3 tries to document what it's about
with links to Ethnologue. For ISO 639-2 I don't know
where they store related info to figure this out...
...okay. Last year they cleaned it up, fri => fry.
But they "forgot" stq => frs, or based on what John
said, they invented a new meaning for "frs" as nds-
dialect, or "frs" was always meant to be said dialect
and ISO 639-2 forgot the real third Frisian language.
More information about the Ietf-languages