Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg]

[CE Whitehead]

I agree with Debbie's suggestion to add a comment to the entry for the subtag [kha]; I am not sure that we need a cross-reference in the entry for Lyngngam, as it's a brand-new entry; no history.

Thanks.

--C. E. Whitehead

Debbie Garside debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk 


> I don't agree here.  I think, as has been done before, that 'kha' should
> have a comment added to say something like "as of  [date] this code 
> does not
> include Lynghgam - see lyg"

> best

> Debbie


--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com