LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION (zxx)
doug at ewellic.org
Sat Apr 12 21:05:30 CEST 2008
<Karen underscore Broome at spe dot sony dot com> wrote:
> I haven't received notification from the LOC yet, but it appears that
> the ISO 639-2 authority has approved "not applicable" as an alternate
> name for zxx.
> If this needs a change request form, I'm happy to create one, but I
> think synchronization with ISO changes doesn't need a form, right?
I think it was agreed in LTRU that in the RFC 4646bis era, *all* changes
to the Registry, including those that simply keep step with the core ISO
and UN standards, need to have a registration form for archiving. This
is in addition to posting the proposed new record on this list for a
week before submission to IANA. And I think it was agreed here that we
would start following the RFC 4646bis-era rules, even though they're not
in effect yet.
Doug Ewell * Arvada, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
More information about the Ietf-languages