Modification Request: frr (Suppress-Script: Latn)
dewell at roadrunner.com
Tue Oct 9 00:04:59 CEST 2007
Addison Phillips <addison at yahoo dash inc dot com> wrote:
>>> Now please, there's been quite enough meta-discussion. Let's nail
>>> down the policy on ltru at ietf.org, since it appears that what is
>>> already written is insufficiently clear.
>> Fair enough, but I expect not to hear any handwaving about leaving
>> the details up to the discretion and judgment of ietf-languages and
>> the Reviewer(s).
> Why not? Handwaving can sometimes be effective.
> Just because the current reviewer doesn't wish to document his
> reasoning behind decisions and just because nobody on the list has the
> temerity to try and document a "sense of the list" statement doesn't
> mean that we should *necessarily* have to do it in 4646bis.
But... but... the LTRU co-chair said LTRU has to nail down the policy
that ietf-languages has to follow. Which is it going to be?
(BTW, this wasn't intended to be a comment about Michael. Practically
no two members of this list seem to have the same vision of how
Suppress-Script fields are supposed to be assigned.)
Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
More information about the Ietf-languages