be-tarask language subtag registration form

[Ihar Hrachyshka]

У Суб, 31/03/2007 у 13:05 +0200, GerardM піша:
> Hoi,
> If that is the case then maybe. In the WMF we have had two groups of
> people who were bringing conflicting information. I am not convinced
> about the information provided. If anything, this is the kind of issue
> where the notions of ISO-639-6 would help. Dealing with this in
> isolation is imho a bad idea. 
> 
> It has also been said that there are three orthographies.. the third
> has not been discussed at all. 
As I know Belarusian Latin script has benn already given a ISO code.
> 
> I would urge restraint and have someone who is knowledgeable about
> this whole issue report on this before you would accept any code. I
> would also make sure that there are acceptable names for these
> orhtographies in Belarus. Be aware that we can get ourselves in
> diplomatic hot water about this. 
> 
> Thanks,
>      Gerard
> 
> On 3/31/07, Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote: 
>         zedlik wrote:
>         
>         > in Internet Taraskievica is used much oftener than
>         Narkamauka
>         
>         If that's the case it could be better to register both
>         variants,
>         maybe using "1933" or "1959" for the official orthography.
>         
>         The application I've in mind are spell checkers, they could
>         ask 
>         the user or pick a user defined default for "be" texts without
>         variant, and otherwise they'd use "tarask" vs. "1993" or
>         "1959".
>         
>         Frank
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________ 
>         Ietf-languages mailing list
>         Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
>         http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages