everson at evertype.com
Sat Jun 16 18:26:47 CEST 2007
Has there been discussion about this? I don't recall it.
Are these changes necessary? Must we revisit this
again, and again, and again? We registered the
subtag. Is that not enough?
At 11:15 -0400 2007-06-16, CE Whitehead wrote:
>Once again I am curious to know what happened to
>Reshat's request to change the comments field
>The two week period has passed, and the
>additional week of delay proposed by Addison has
>I assume Reshat is still interested in the change.
>--C. E. Whitehead
>cewcathar at hotmail.com
>CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:
>>>Whatever happened to Reshat's request to
>>>change the comments field of baku1926 ??
>>>The two week review period has passed.
>>Here is the "final" proposed record, with all
>>spacing as it would appear in the Registry.
>>Addison proposed that this should be available
>>on-list for a week before registering the
>>Description: Unified Turkic Latin Alphabet (Historical)
>>Comments: Denotes alphabet used in Turkic republics/regions of the
>> former USSR in late 1920s, and throughout 1930s, which aspired to
>> represent equivalent phonemes in a unified fashion. Also known as: New
>> Turkic Alphabet; Birlәşdirilmiş Jeni Tyrk
>> Әlifbasь; Jaŋalif.
>>I don't oppose this modification, since it
>>corrects an error in one of the alternative
>>names for the alphabet.
>>Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
>Dont miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other
>great prizes from Microsoft Office Live
>Ietf-languages mailing list
>Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Ietf-languages