Michael Everson everson at
Sat Jun 16 18:26:47 CEST 2007

Has there been discussion about this? I don't recall it.

Are these changes necessary? Must we revisit this 
again, and again, and again? We registered the 
subtag. Is that not enough?

At 11:15 -0400 2007-06-16, CE Whitehead wrote:
>Once again I am curious to know what happened to 
>Reshat's request to change the comments field 
>for baku1926?
> )
>The two week period has passed, and the 
>additional week of delay proposed by Addison has 
>I assume Reshat is still interested in the change.
>--C. E. Whitehead
>cewcathar at
>CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:
>>>Whatever happened to Reshat's request to 
>>>change the comments field of baku1926 ??
>>>The two week review period has passed.
>>Here is the "final" proposed record, with all 
>>spacing as it would appear in the Registry. 
>>Addison proposed that this should be available 
>>on-list for a week before registering the 
>>Type: variant
>>Subtag: baku1926
>>Description: Unified Turkic Latin Alphabet (Historical)
>>Added: 2007-04-18
>>Prefix: az
>>Prefix: ba
>>Prefix: crh
>>Prefix: kk
>>Prefix: krc
>>Prefix: ky
>>Prefix: sah
>>Prefix: tk
>>Prefix: tt
>>Prefix: uz
>>Comments: Denotes alphabet used in Turkic republics/regions of the
>>  former USSR in late 1920s, and throughout 1930s, which aspired to
>>  represent equivalent phonemes in a unified fashion. Also known as: New
>>  Turkic Alphabet; Birl&#x4D9;&#x15F;dirilmi&#x15F; Jeni Tyrk
>>  &#x4D8;lifbas&#x44C;; Ja&#x14B;alif.
>>I don't oppose this modification, since it 
>>corrects an error in one of the alternative 
>>names for the alphabet.
>>Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
>Don’t miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other 
>great prizes from Microsoft Office Live 
>Ietf-languages mailing list
>Ietf-languages at

Michael Everson *

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list