CE Whitehead cewcathar at
Sat Jun 16 17:15:32 CEST 2007

Once again I am curious to know what happened to Reshat's request to change 
the comments field for baku1926?
( )

The two week period has passed, and the additional week of delay proposed by 
Addison has passed.

I assume Reshat is still interested in the change.


--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at

CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:
>>Whatever happened to Reshat's request to change the comments field of 
>>baku1926 ??
>>The two week review period has passed.
>Here is the "final" proposed record, with all spacing as it would appear in 
>the Registry.  Addison proposed that this should be available on-list for a 
>week before registering the subtag.
>Type: variant
>Subtag: baku1926
>Description: Unified Turkic Latin Alphabet (Historical)
>Added: 2007-04-18
>Prefix: az
>Prefix: ba
>Prefix: crh
>Prefix: kk
>Prefix: krc
>Prefix: ky
>Prefix: sah
>Prefix: tk
>Prefix: tt
>Prefix: uz
>Comments: Denotes alphabet used in Turkic republics/regions of the
>  former USSR in late 1920s, and throughout 1930s, which aspired to
>  represent equivalent phonemes in a unified fashion. Also known as: New
>  Turkic Alphabet; Birl&#x4D9;&#x15F;dirilmi&#x15F; Jeni Tyrk
>  &#x4D8;lifbas&#x44C;; Ja&#x14B;alif.
>I don't oppose this modification, since it corrects an error in one of the 
>alternative names for the alphabet.
>Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14

Don’t miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft 
Office Live

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list