baku1926
CE Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
Sat Jun 16 17:15:32 CEST 2007
Once again I am curious to know what happened to Reshat's request to change
the comments field for baku1926?
(http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/2007-May/006598.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/2007-May/006597.html )
The two week period has passed, and the additional week of delay proposed by
Addison has passed.
I assume Reshat is still interested in the change.
Thanks!
--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:
>
>>Whatever happened to Reshat's request to change the comments field of
>>baku1926 ??
>>
>>The two week review period has passed.
>
>Here is the "final" proposed record, with all spacing as it would appear in
>the Registry. Addison proposed that this should be available on-list for a
>week before registering the subtag.
>
>-----
>Type: variant
>Subtag: baku1926
>Description: Unified Turkic Latin Alphabet (Historical)
>Added: 2007-04-18
>Prefix: az
>Prefix: ba
>Prefix: crh
>Prefix: kk
>Prefix: krc
>Prefix: ky
>Prefix: sah
>Prefix: tk
>Prefix: tt
>Prefix: uz
>Comments: Denotes alphabet used in Turkic republics/regions of the
> former USSR in late 1920s, and throughout 1930s, which aspired to
> represent equivalent phonemes in a unified fashion. Also known as: New
> Turkic Alphabet; Birlәşdirilmiş Jeni Tyrk
> Әlifbasь; Jaŋalif.
>-----
>
>I don't oppose this modification, since it corrects an error in one of the
>alternative names for the alphabet.
>
>--
>Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
_________________________________________________________________
Dont miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft
Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0540003042mrt/direct/01/
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list