ISO 639 decision: arc = Official Aramaic; Imperial Aramaic

[Mark Davis]

I'm satisfied that this is a clarifying change.

Mark

On 6/3/07, Doug Ewell <dewell at roadrunner.com> wrote:
>
> Håvard Hjulstad <HHj at standard dot no> wrote:
>
> > There are many languages called "Xyz Aramaic"; see the ISO 639-3 web
> site:
> > http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/. It was found that "arc" had previously
> been
> > used practically exclusively for "Official Aramaic", and it was deemed
> > more appropriate to modify the name to reflect that.
>
> Is it agreed, then, that this is a clarifying change and not a
> functionally
> narrowing change?  I have the LSR registration form all ready to submit if
> it is so agreed.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
> http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
> http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>



-- 
Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20070603/c7b191a5/attachment.html