be-tarask

[Doug Ewell]

Jeremy Carroll <jjc at hpl dot hp dot com> wrote:

> It seems to allow for the word 'classical' to appear in the 
> registration, but as a book title; and hence allows us to proceed 
> without having to adjudicate on whether that title is or is not an 
> appropriate one

Jaska never said it was part of a book title.  This is an unfortunate 
misunderstanding that keeps being repeated.  Jaska wrote:

> This is the title given by the book mentioned in references in the 
> form.

using the word "title" to mean "more-or-less official name given to the 
orthography," and Yury interpreted this as being part of a book title, 
which was not Jaska's intent.

I recommend that the Reviewer declare a second two-week review period, 
although I don't know if it will accomplish much in getting the two 
sides ("definitely must say 'classic'" versus "definitely must not say 
'classic'") to agree on this.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages