"mis" update review request

[Michael Everson]

This is not a linguistic entity so I can hardly make a linguistic 
judgement about it. Please come to consensus and I will approve 
accordingly. I nominate John Cowan as the Consensus Taker for this 
one. ;-)

At 19:31 +0200 2007-04-13, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>Peter Constable wrote:
>
>>  Collections are a notion that is relevant across all parts of ISO 639.
>
>Okay, after replacing 639-3 by 639-2 I now arrive at ISO 639, see below.
>For more examples of harmful mis-interpretations (pun intended) compare
><http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ltru/7504>
>
>Frank
>
>LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM
>1. Name of requester:                   Frank Ellermann
>2. E-mail address of requester:         nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
>3. Record Requested:
>
>    Type:                                language
>    Subtag:                              mis
>    Description:                         Miscellaneous Languages
>    Comments:                            A collection of unrelated languages
>                                         which don't belong to any other
>                                         ISO 639 collection
>
>4. Intended meaning of the subtag:      n/a (no change)
>5. Reference to published description
>    of the language (book or article):
>                         http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ltru/7478
>                         http://www.sil.org/ISO639-3/scope.asp#C
>6. Any other relevant information:      n/a (comment added)


-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com