"mis" update review request

[Mark Davis]

Saying that mis is a collection is not breaking, but also not substatiated
by ISO 639-2.

http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/normtext.html
http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php

Saying that "which don't belong to any other collection" is a breaking
change, *and* is not substantiated by ISO 639-2 at the time the code was
added to the registry (or even now).

Mark

On 4/13/07, Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote:
>
> Mark Davis wrote:
>
> > We are not working with ISO 639-3 in BCP 47!
>
> John just noted that it's exactly the same for ISO 639-2,
> see <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.languages/4443>
>
> To clarify it we can replace "639-3" by "639-2" in the
> updated comment:
>
> | A collection of unrelated languages which don't belong
> | to any other ISO 639-2 collection
>
> Frank
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>



-- 
Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20070413/79200af8/attachment.html