Misha.Wolf at reuters.com
Sat Jun 24 13:40:51 CEST 2006
> But then the various divergent opinions within ietf-languages started to
> be heard: at least one person wanted *only* the ASCII version, at least
> one other person wanted *only* the version with U+02BC, and at least one
> or two other people wanted to keep one version exactly as stated on the
> ISO 639 Web page, regardless of whether we add more.
Why don't we ask the MA/RA to fix it rather than spend time arguing about it?
To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
More information about the Ietf-languages