Sign languages (was: Re: additions to ISO 639 and the IANA
language subtag registry)
cowan at ccil.org
Tue Feb 21 14:42:09 CET 2006
Michael Everson scripsit:
> > Much better would be "xxx-signed", etc.
> This is only applicable to one class of signed language. And Signed
> English using BSI is a very different thing from Signed English using
> ASL or ISL.
An excellent point. I think we have to leave the signed spoken languages
alone for now.
John Cowan cowan at ccil.org www.ap.org www.ccil.org/~cowan
Nobody expects the RESTifarian Inquisition! Our chief weapon is
surprise ... surprise and tedium ... tedium and surprise ....
Our two weapons are tedium and surprise ... and ruthless disregard
for unpleasant facts.... Our three weapons are tedium, surprise, and
ruthless disregard ... and an almost fanatical devotion to Roy Fielding....
More information about the Ietf-languages