Language Tag Reviewer
MRC at CAC.Washington.EDU
Mon Feb 20 19:07:52 CET 2006
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
> Note, too, that I did send a public request for you to get in touch on the
> ietf-languages list. You didn't reply to that message. The time constraint
> is real, though it can be adjusted.
With all due respect, it wears a bit thin for the IESG to talk about time
constraints. The IESG frequently moves with glacial speed when others
depend upon IESG action. Such as we see now with the PR action.
Patience needs to be mutual.
>> Why on earth did you add list moderation to the duties of the
>> language-tag reviewer without (at least) asking the encumbant
>> reviewer what his opinion is?
> I didn't make that change (the IETF community did), and I did ask for your
> opinion when it became my obligation to do so.
Nevertheless, Michael's opinions were not asked, much less getting
I respectfully suggest that the process is broken. As the process was
broken, remedial action is now needed.
It isn't really necessary to discuss how the process came to be broken, as
long as the problem gets fixed.
-- Mark --
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
More information about the Ietf-languages