3066ter (Re: Guernsey Jersey and Isle of Man ISO 3166-1 Codes)
harald at alvestrand.no
Fri Apr 7 08:27:06 CEST 2006
John Cowan wrote:
> L.Gillam at surrey.ac.uk scripsit:
>> These can now be more precisely tagged from March 2006,
>> but prior to March 2006? If resources in these languages
>> were being lumped in under roa, might it also be helpful
>> to guide people away from using roa towards this increased
>> precision? Not saying include more/less in the registry,
>> though others might.
> Using "roa" or "roa-GB" would be a matter of opinion: are the varieties
> spoken in the Channel Islands French, or separate languages? Best
> practice, I think, is to avoid the collective language tags whenever
> possible, but we are in a delicate stage between 3066bis and 3066ter,
> where some documents may not be classifiable in any other way.
3066ter is not on the table, does not have a schedule, and may never happen.
We are not in a delicate stage between them. We are in the 3066bis regime.
My personal opinion is that when ISO 639-3 is finally approved by ISO,
it is time for the IETF to discuss whether or not an update of 3066bis
is needed to accomodate the structures that will be standardized there -
and it is my personal opinion that the result is likely to be "yes".
But this list exists, at the moment, to discuss registrations under 3066bis.
More information about the Ietf-languages