Mandarin Chinese, Simplified Script

Karen_Broome at Karen_Broome at
Wed Jun 15 19:49:15 CEST 2005

Hmm. I was planning on using these right away. Are these currently 
compliant if I do not feel I need the country codes? I was under the 
impression that these were not controversial. 

Karen Broome
Senior Troublemaker
Sony Pictures

"Mark Davis" <mark.davis at>
Sent by: ietf-languages-bounces at
06/15/2005 08:28 AM

        To:     <ietf-languages at>, "Michael Everson" <everson at>
        Subject:        Re: Mandarin Chinese, Simplified Script

The following are needed, but I think we can wait for 3066bis: sr_Cyrl_CS,
sr_Latn_CS,  sr_Cyrl_BA  ,  sr_Latn_BA


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Everson" <everson at>
To: <ietf-languages at>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 13:36
Subject: RE: Mandarin Chinese, Simplified Script

> At 13:10 -0700 2005-06-14, Peter Constable wrote:
> >I support the registration requests for zh-cmn, zh-cmn-Hant and
> >zh-cmn-Hans.
> So do I and so does everyone else but don't want to get yelled at
> again about the fortnight.
> Are there any other preemptive 3066 changes we should make similar to
> -- 
> Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at

Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list