I approve the registration of es-419 (Latin American Spanish)

[Michael Everson]

Do not write to me privately. Honestly, do not write to me at all.

At 23:39 +0200 2005-06-13, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
>On 23:09 13/06/2005, Michael Everson said:
>>At 13:59 -0700 2005-06-13, Mark Davis wrote:
>>>I am personally in favor of this proposal, but formally 2 weeks have to pass
>>>to allow for objections according to RFC3066.
>>
>>I consider this a follow-on from the es-americas request which was 
>>for the *same* entity. There is no reason to wait 2 weeks on this 
>>one. So unless you REALLY have an objection I see no reason not to 
>>approve it immediately. I detect strong consensus *for* this tag.
>
>I would agree. But I have a small problem: what does tell people 
>that 419 is Latin America? I plan to heavily use E.164 and X.121, my 
>plan was to use e33 for France and x310 for the USA or something 
>like it. Objection to use u419? Or to document in some list best 
>practice that default is UN?
>
>(obviously this is for the  ASCII grid - in our approach non ASCII 
>grids will follow their interindexed parallel system).
>jfc

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com