sgn-MT [et al.]
mark.davis at jtcsv.com
Tue Oct 5 20:49:31 CEST 2004
Addison and I have discussed this, and don't have any objections to the four
new registrations for sgn-XX.
However, since we are very close on getting 3066bis out the door, as a
general policy we'd like to see people refrain from new tag registrations
for a few weeks where possible (eg, where there is no urgent user
requirement for a new registration), since it makes the work of converting
to the subtag registry much simpler.
More information about the Ietf-languages