Basic problems with the Linguasphere Lisbon paper
scripts20 at uk2.net
Sun Jun 6 17:18:21 CEST 2004
I read "WEAVING THE LINGUASPHERE": LS 639, ISO 639 and ISO 12620, by David
Dalby and Lee Gillam
Here are some pros and cons
1. Language documentation
The language documentation and the variable length Linguasphere Scale are
in themselves useful, as standalone information, and I refer to it quite
1. Coding method
However, given the existence of the variable length Linguasphere Scale
(see Section 3.2 of the paper), what is the needs justification for the
fixed length Linguasphere Identifiers (LS 639 alpha4 langtags)
(see section 3.3)?
It just seems unnecessary (and confusing) duplication, and devised for no
2. Confusion of names
You also talk about "the Linguasphere Identifiers, known collectively as
This seems particularly confusing overlap with ISO 639, when it is NOT a
standard, (and not yet even an ISO NWIP, it seems - as you wrote: "__If__
LS 639 is accepted as the basis of a NWIP (New Work Item Proposal) by
Furthermore, what are documents LS1 to LS638, and LS640 onwards, and where
can one find details of them?
You also wrote:
"The mnemonic form of most alpha4 langtags favours human readability
essential machine readability. Although machines have no need for mnemonic
communities of speakers are likely to prefer the meaningful tagging of
based on their own autonyms."
Except that mnemonicity ALWAYS breaks down after a certain number of
languages have any coding system allocated - there's just too many
languages for this to work well. So what's the point of mneminicity?
More information about the Ietf-languages