Registered sgn-* tags

Michael Everson everson at
Mon Jul 12 22:39:15 CEST 2004

At 13:35 -0700 2004-07-12, Peter Constable wrote:

>I had reservations when these were registered a few years ago, not
>because of the semantics being denoted but because of the way tags were
>being formed. I still have reservations. If and when we extend a
>successor of RFC 3066 to incorporate support for ISO 639-3, all of these
>signed languages (and more) will have their own atomic, alpha-3

Not signed spoken languages.
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list