Registered sgn-* tags

[Michael Everson]

At 13:35 -0700 2004-07-12, Peter Constable wrote:

>I had reservations when these were registered a few years ago, not
>because of the semantics being denoted but because of the way tags were
>being formed. I still have reservations. If and when we extend a
>successor of RFC 3066 to incorporate support for ISO 639-3, all of these
>signed languages (and more) will have their own atomic, alpha-3
>identifier.

Not signed spoken languages.
-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com