Choice of language code for Serbian

[Mark Davis]

CS1 is a known error (reported to us early). But since there is such a long
turn-around between when we submit and when it shows up, we can just gather
these up on this list.

Mark
__________________________________
http://www.macchiato.com
► शिष्यादिच्छेत्पराजयम् ◄

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Constable" <petercon at microsoft.com>
To: <ietf-languages at alvestrand.no>
Sent: Mon, 2004 Jan 12 12:28
Subject: RE: Choice of language code for Serbian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-
> bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Danilo Segan

> As far as I read, SCG should be used unless there are some
> ambiguities.  I've checked the archives of the list, but couldn't
> find anything related to strict "CS1" choice (I found a couple
> debates on CS assignment itself).
>
> So please let me know of the rationale for choosing CS1 over SCG.

I suspect that "CS1" was intended for illustration purposes only; unless
there are ambiguities that existing, it does seem like the alpha-3
identifier from ISO 3166-1, SCG, is what is the first alternative to be
used if there is an ambiguity problem with the alpha-2 identifier.



Peter

Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages