Request for publication: New Version Notification for draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04

Patrik Fältström patrik at
Sun Mar 6 16:47:19 CET 2011


I have once again changed the acknowledgement section. I have gone back to the discussion I have had with the IETF trust, and re-read all comments on this list (and off list) from various people.

The final suggestion from me as an editor is the following. Reasoning for this is that it is very uncommon, if it has happened at all, that single individuals are pointed out as being in the rough part of the rough consensus. This mainly because it looks like if everyone else _strongly_ supports every single word in the document. A statement I can not stand behind as an editor.

As an editor I can only say in this section a) who has helped, and b) that there was rough consensus behind the document.

5.  Acknowledgements

   The main contributors are (in alphabetical order) Eric Brunner-
   Williams, Vint Cerf, Tina Dam, Martin Duerst, John Klensin, Mark
   Davis, Pete Resnick, Markus Scherer, Andrew Sullivan, Kenneth
   Whistler and Nicholas Williams.

   Not all contributors believe the solution for the issues discussed in
   this document is optimal.

With this, I hereby ask the area director for this to be published as an RFC.

Thanks everyone.


Begin forwarded message:

> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission at>
> Date: 6 mars 2011 16.40.11 CET
> To: paf at
> Cc: paul.hoffman at
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04 
> A new version of I-D, draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt has been successfully submitted by Patrik Faltstrom and posted to the IETF repository.
> Filename:	 draft-faltstrom-5892bis
> Revision:	 04
> Title:		 The Unicode code points and IDNA - Unicode 6.0
> Creation_date:	 2011-03-06
> WG ID:		 Independent Submission
> Number_of_pages: 5
> Abstract:
> This document specifies IETF consensus for IDNA derived character
> properties related to the three code points, existing in Unicode 5.2,
> that changed property values when version 6.0 was released.  The
> consensus is that no update is needed to RFC 5892 based on the
> changes made in Unicode 6.0.
> The IETF Secretariat.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 235 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the Idna-update mailing list