AW: Mapping Poll - REQUEST

Georg Ochsner g.ochsner at
Tue Feb 9 19:41:49 CET 2010

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: idna-update-bounces at [mailto:idna-update-
> bounces at] Im Auftrag von Vint Cerf
> Gesendet: Montag, 8. Februar 2010 09:57
> An: idna-update at

> The options are tersely listed below:
> 1. Would the WG like to adopt the current "mapping document" as-is?

Yes. And in my eyes this has been the consensus so far.

> 2. Would the WG like to engage in further discussion about this
> document, for example in the context of the Unicode TR46 that
> advocates substantially more mapping than the present "mappings"
> document?


> 3. Would the WG propose an alternative path towards dealing with the
> question of mapping and if so, what proposition(s) are offered by the
> WG members?



More information about the Idna-update mailing list