Mapping Poll - REQUEST
yaojk at cnnic.cn
Tue Feb 9 02:07:58 CET 2010
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vint Cerf" <vint at google.com>
To: <idna-update at alvestrand.no>
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 4:56 PM
Subject: Mapping Poll - REQUEST
> Please read and respond to the recent long message that ultimately
> asked for WG recommendations for moving forward on mapping.
> The Area Director is of the opinion that we do not have rough
> consensus on a way forward, so expressing your position is essential.
> The options are tersely listed below:
> 1. Would the WG like to adopt the current "mapping document" as-is?
> 2. Would the WG like to engage in further discussion about this
> document, for example in the context of the Unicode TR46 that
> advocates substantially more mapping than the present "mappings"
language issues are too complex, we might never get a consensus.
We can not enumerate all the issues.
when this issuse is resolved, another will emerge.
The general framework may be necessary.
More information about the Idna-update